Attractiveness Test: How Attractive Am I?

The attractiveness test turns one front-facing photo into a facial harmony score in under a minute, in your browser. It maps 478 points on your face, measures four parts of your geometry and weights them into one number out of 100, with its 1 to 10 equivalent.

Scores from arm’s-length, straight-on, evenly lit photos are stable within a couple of points. Selfies taken close to the face are not comparable with them, because a close lens changes the ratios the score is built from.

Most face rating sites score attractiveness from 1 to 10, so this test shows your harmony score on that scale too, next to the score out of 100. The 1 to 10 number is the one the pretty scale test gives: an average face reads 4.9, and most well-lit, straight-on photos land between 4.2 and 6.0.

Each point out of 100 moves the 1 to 10 number by about 0.16, so the bands meet cleanly: 79 out of 100 is 6.0, balanced harmony, and 80 is 6.1, high harmony.

If your harmony score is 68 or more, your facial geometry sits where most faces land or above it, which is the honest yes a photo can give. Below 68, the band says which kind of below it is, and a low symmetry reading is more often the photo than the face. How attractive you are in person also depends on skin, expression, grooming and style, which no photo score sees.

The pretty scale test asks the same question the way most people phrase it and gives your score with its tier, and the am I ugly test answers it from the other side, band by band. All three read the same measurement, so they agree on one face.

Attractiveness research consistently finds that geometry is only one input, and not the biggest. Skin quality and evenness, expression, grooming, and averageness (how typical your features are for your population) all move real-world attractiveness ratings substantially, and none of them are in this score.

Perfectly symmetric, perfectly proportioned faces generated in labs consistently rate as uncanny rather than beautiful. Most real faces score 60 to 85 here, and distinctive geometry describes memorable faces, not flawed ones. Use the number as geometry, not identity.

Bone geometry is fixed, so treat the fixed components as information, not homework. What genuinely moves in photos and in person: symmetry readings improve with straight-on posture and even lighting (the measurement artifact is real, and so is the visual effect); brows are the strongest adjustable line on the face and can visibly rebalance thirds and eye spacing; hair adds or removes width exactly where you choose; and skin quality, which this score deliberately excludes, moves real-world attractiveness ratings more than any ratio and responds to a consistent routine within weeks.

That is what the full report of all 19 measurements is for. Built from the same selfie, it separates what to accept (your ratios), what to style around (shape recommendations chain from these exact measurements), and what to work on (the skin sections respond to routine changes you can track).

Most face-rating sites run your photo through an opaque model and hand back a number with no explanation, so you cannot tell what moved it or verify anything. This test does the opposite: the four components and their weights are disclosed on this page, every input is a measurement you can check against the landmarks drawn on your photo, and the photo never leaves your browser. The score is free here, out of 100 and on the 1 to 10 scale. The full report of all 19 measurements is built from the same selfie, on your device.